| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Firefox are too Generous | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Aug 8 2009, 05:53 AM (604 Views) | |
| Viral. | Aug 8 2009, 05:53 AM Post #1 |
![]()
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Spoiler: click to toggle
|
![]() |
|
| Pete B | Aug 8 2009, 06:38 AM Post #2 |
![]()
|
Even the first tick for IE is questionable. |
![]() |
|
| Gorgor | Aug 8 2009, 07:39 AM Post #3 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My Invisionfree forums which people call "epicly modified" totally mess up in Internet Explorer, so number one for IE is questionable... |
![]() |
|
| Lout | Aug 8 2009, 07:52 AM Post #4 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think laughable is more appropriate
|
![]() |
|
| Delirium | Aug 8 2009, 08:30 AM Post #5 |
|
Who Watches the Watchmen?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think they wanted to give IE at least 1 of them. |
![]() |
|
| Jakɚ | Aug 10 2009, 01:13 AM Post #6 |
|
Werepossehm?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Even if it's lacking all of them?
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Aug 10 2009, 04:03 PM Post #7 |
|
Deleted User
|
Definitely questionable, at best. If they wanted to be polite or something, they could have added another characteristic to check off for both, like "Free" or "Resizable" or "Considerably more bloated than previous versions". ![]() |
|
|
| Aaron | Aug 11 2009, 12:31 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Green Rocks Blue Socks!
![]()
|
I think they had to give it to them on a technicality as there are sites that use ActiveX and other IE only things out there still, but most likely confined to interanets from corporations and the pages/software in them. |
![]() |
|
| Will | Aug 27 2009, 11:53 AM Post #9 |
![]()
|
They're lucky I'm not in charge of making those lists. That's far too outlandish.I'd do something like this:
|
![]() |
|
| Nicolas | Aug 27 2009, 11:56 AM Post #10 |
|
Awesome - Now coming to you in blue
![]()
|
Even your first field is questionable for IE.
|
![]() |
|
| Will | Aug 27 2009, 11:58 AM Post #11 |
![]()
|
I considered only giving them half a check mark... but... ![]() IE does allow you to browse the web. It doesn't say anything about the quality of your browsing. |
![]() |
|
| davadude | Aug 28 2009, 05:54 AM Post #12 |
|
Pie--
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nice find.
|
![]() |
|
| FearKiller | Aug 28 2009, 03:56 PM Post #13 |
|
www.fearkiller.net
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The first tick should be changed to "Great tool for downloading Firefox."
Edited by FearKiller, Aug 28 2009, 03:56 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| ZapTap | Aug 28 2009, 10:26 PM Post #14 |
|
Want to talk? My inbox is always open
:D
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
hehe, but then it would only get half a check because you can still use other browsers, or FF itself if it's an upgrade
|
![]() |
|
| Sayf Udeen | Aug 29 2009, 12:08 AM Post #15 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Meh. I'm pretty sure they ain't doing it for nothing.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Technology Chat · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2






![]](http://209.85.62.24/static/1/pip_r.png)








That's far too outlandish.
ie_sympathy.png (24.93 KB)
12:15 AM Nov 24