Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Linus Torvald's C++ Rant; Contains foul language in the link
Topic Started: Jul 28 2009, 01:47 PM (408 Views)
Grant A.
Member Avatar
Member
[ * ]
You didn't hear it from me. :ph34r:

http://lwn.net/Articles/249460/
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fission
Member Avatar
SRS BSNS
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Is there any point to this but to try to start an argument over which language is better? Because, really, I don't fall for troll-bait. Most of the time.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Grant A.
Member Avatar
Member
[ * ]
Fission
Jul 28 2009, 02:24 PM
Is there any point to this but to try to start an argument over which language is better? Because, really, I don't fall for troll-bait. Most of the time.
I didn't really provide this to start an argument. I just thought that it was rather interesting, considering that he is quite an influential programmer.

Besides, there is no "better" language, as each language is specifically designed for a certain task. No language is clearly better than another, as they all have their low points, and their high points.
Edited by Grant A., Jul 29 2009, 04:32 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fission
Member Avatar
SRS BSNS
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Regardless, it seems you're pushing your point a bit hard. It's a bit disconcerting, really >_>
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Paper
Member Avatar
Member
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
I'm not 100% sure, but I think that Linus might have just a small dislike of C++

Object Orientated programming is a very good idea, but it's still in its early days really.
Edited by Paper, Jul 31 2009, 05:52 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fission
Member Avatar
SRS BSNS
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Paper
Jul 31 2009, 05:41 PM
Object Orientated programming is a very good idea, but it's still in its early days really.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming

Quote:
 
Objects as programming entities were introduced in the 1960s. . .


His rant is all C++, which is far from the only programming language that supports OOP, and not OOP overall. OOP is a very useful feature of many programming languages. Most languages actually support OOP. C, C++, Java, PHP, JavaScript, Lua, and Python all support OOP at least in some form.
Edited by Fission, Aug 1 2009, 03:35 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Paper
Member Avatar
Member
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Well yes I am aware. I say that because I don't see many actively using it - for the simple fact that it's not useful unless you really know how to exploit it.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Reid.
C'est un piège!
[ *  *  * ]
Paper
Aug 27 2009, 10:00 AM
Well yes I am aware. I say that because I don't see many actively using it - for the simple fact that it's not useful unless you really know how to exploit it.
Welcome to jQuery, the world of object-oriented programming.

Or prototype. Or [insert your favorite library here.]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fission
Member Avatar
SRS BSNS
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Yep, and JSON is actually just shorthand for defining an object. Many things you think are not OOP are.

Edit:

And I can guarantee that almost any game you download is going to use objects. Also, ActionScript is based around a gigantic object hierarchy, so that includes almost any Flash thingamawhatsit you may find. Java's entire base structure is also object-based, so there's your Java applets. Oh, that browser you're using? Uses objects, guaranteed.
Edited by Fission, Aug 30 2009, 09:47 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Reid.
C'est un piège!
[ *  *  * ]
Fission
Aug 30 2009, 09:45 AM
Yep, and JSON is actually just shorthand for defining an object. Many things you think are not OOP are.

Edit:

And I can guarantee that almost any game you download is going to use objects. Also, ActionScript is based around a gigantic object hierarchy, so that includes almost any Flash thingamawhatsit you may find. Java's entire base structure is also object-based, so there's your Java applets. Oh, that browser you're using? Uses objects, guaranteed.
JSON - JavaScript Object Notation (if memory serves) :P

Objects are almost everywhere, whether they are prototype-based or class-based. OOP is a wonderful thing.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jory
Member Avatar


OOP isn't about the language, its about the mindset. :) (Though obviously, some languages are more suited for OOP then others.)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Programming and Scripting Chat · Next Topic »
Add Reply