Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Windows Live Messenger 2009; Beta Version
Topic Started: Oct 9 2008, 11:34 AM (663 Views)
Nicola Oct 20 2008, 01:36 PM Post #16
.....

 Oh lord... another 'upgrade' to ignore ;)

Looks awful, honestly. IMO it's only really going to appeal to people who put aesthetics over usability and function.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Justin Oct 20 2008, 01:45 PM Post #17
Member Avatar
Member
[ * * * * * ]
 Heh, I'm still running 4.7. :arr:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SuperHiro Oct 20 2008, 02:57 PM Post #18
Member
[ * ]
 Just installed it, I love it =D other than the fact some peoples DPs don't fill the box its really good. No lag with webcams and doesn't have a long load time either.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Yorkshireman Oct 20 2008, 04:34 PM Post #19
Member
[ * * ]
Justin
Oct 20 2008, 01:45 PM
Heh, I'm still running 4.7. :arr:
^o) :blink: OKayyy. That's not much more evolved than Windows Messenger. :-/
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Will Oct 20 2008, 05:58 PM Post #20
Member Avatar


 Giving it a try now. Looks a bit cozier, but I see no significant improvments over previous versions.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fission Oct 20 2008, 06:02 PM Post #21
Member Avatar
SRS BSNS
[ * * * * * ]
 I tried it out, some cool features and a bit faster with emoticons (which take forever in the latest full release), but some emoticons don't even work for me. They show up to others, however. So I decided to go back to the old one.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Yorkshireman Oct 20 2008, 07:54 PM Post #22
Member
[ * * ]
Fission
Oct 20 2008, 06:02 PM
I tried it out, some cool features and a bit faster with emoticons (which take forever in the latest full release), but some emoticons don't even work for me. They show up to others, however. So I decided to go back to the old one.
Hmmm, I have problems with emoticans to I've uninstalled it and continued with 8.5.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dyegov Oct 21 2008, 01:21 PM Post #23
Member Avatar
D . r . e . a . m . i . n . g
[ * * * * * * ]
Nicola
Oct 20 2008, 01:36 PM
Oh lord... another 'upgrade' to ignore ;)

Looks awful, honestly. IMO it's only really going to appeal to people who put aesthetics over usability and function.
And that is actually 90% of us, the users :)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Yorkshireman Oct 21 2008, 02:18 PM Post #24
Member
[ * * ]
Dyegov
Oct 21 2008, 01:21 PM
Nicola
Oct 20 2008, 01:36 PM
Looks awful, honestly. IMO it's only really going to appeal to people who put aesthetics over usability and function.
And that is actually 90% of us, the users :)
I actually find there's a nice medium between all three. :D I don't think it's too much to ask for all three.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Meph Oct 22 2008, 10:49 AM Post #25
Member Avatar
Member
[ * * ]
 WLM9 (part of Wave 3 of Windows Live) has more back-end improvement than user-end. That's why there's less features. ;)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Darren Gilmour Oct 26 2008, 04:37 PM Post #26
I seriously am dumb.
[ * * * ]
 I am going to try it out Now.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Technology Chat · Next Topic »
Add Reply