Support Restriction

Support Restriction

If this blog entry is deleted (once again favoritism will strike, seeing as Nicola can talk crap in her blog all she wants), it's just because particular staff members like to hide their favoritism (like Scotty gaining favoritism over me when it comes to the code index I offered and he posted) for each other and they don't want members to know the truth. If I'm banned, it's because they can't take the truth and they don't like to hear others blunt opinions, because their opinion is all that matters.

So, why was Cory, the support whore, restricted?

Answer:

I was support restricted by the almighty Stephen for one cocky post I made in the Theme & CSS Help forum in regards to Nicola's warning (where she made assumptions and called me cocky). Well the post I got support restricted for showed her more of my cocky side. I was actually pretty truthful in the post though, seeing as Nicola's a hound dog in her Theme & CSS Help forum. Pretty sad that she had to add alt=""/ in the image tag (heck, I saw an extra quotation mark when she was using the src attribute, making it be read as empty) to one of my posts to make it XHTML valid, whereas you see tons of invalid codes all the time in the other support forums. Seriously, she owns that forum basically. Make one little mistake, you get warned.

Stephens always going around supporting his homies in any possible way he can. It's almost like he's the one sucking up to them, when it seems they'd be sucking up to him instead. If Nicola says it goes this way, by golly she'll crack her whip on Stephen and he'll obey.

Any who, the reason I was warned this time was certainly unjustified. Pretty much I got warned for referencing CSS3 that is yet to be supported in pretty much all browsers but a few. Here's the part I don't understand and where I haven't been stood corrected: I informed the user of the incompatibility of CSS3 in my post and I was still warned; which I assume Nicola just did because she hates me and likes to make silly assumptions, then turn all bad ass on me. She thought I made that post to look "cool" or because I wasn't aware of the incompatibility. I just informed the user that it will be possible to do it the way he wants to do it in the near-future; I never suggested that he use the method as Nicola and Stephen imply (and are too blind to see). The article I linked after that addendum was quite informative, by the way (and the main reason I posted).

As for being support restricted, I didn't know one post of cockiness could cause that. Why's Nicola not restricted then? Oh, yeah.

I've seen many mistakes Nicola has made in her support posts. They too are often little mistakes like mine. Does she go warning herself of have some other staff member do it for her? No, of course not. Speaking of Nicola, she's the reason so many people have left the boards she's apart of. No one can take her power abuse and everything else about her, which is basically everything she says she's not. She thinks she's like the most perfect being on the planet. So sad that she thinks that. Can't wait for her to experience a piece of reality.

I've only received warnings from Nicola, by the way. Shows how much she hates me, seeing as I post more in the areas she does not (such as the "General Support - IF" forum). Fortunately, some of the other support team members know an occasional mistake when they see one (I see them all the time from the likes of their selves; human like me). Even though this warning wasn't a mistake this time, it was Nicola over-throwing her power and hatred towards me with other staff such as Stephen agreeing with the goddess of the thrown.

Nicola thinks I'm just griping and complaining. I am partially, but for the most part I'm just tired with all that she gets away with. Her negative sides aren't looked upon at all; CSS goddess and just favoritism in general is the only reason she's still here.

Here's Nicola's PM, by the way:

http://i42.tinypic.com/jj1eud.png